|
Martin
Models 223 and 247
XB-48
Jet Bomber
Variants/Specifications
After
issuing specifications for the first generation
of jet bombers in April 1944, the Army Air
Forces ordered competing prototypes from
four companies. It was inconceivable that
there would not be a Martin Bomber among
them; the other manufacturers were North
American, Consolidated, and Boeing. The
whole series was designated XB-45 through
48. (Later on the Northrop flying wing,
re-engined with jets, also joined the competition
as the YB-49.) All of the designs were to
use Allison/General Electric) J35 engines
with 4,000 pounds of thrust The North American
and Consolidated designs each mounted four
engines, the Boeing and Martin ones six.
All were to be capable of carrying the 22,000-pound
"Grand Slam" bomb (a stand-in for the still
secret atomic bomb) and crews of two pilots
and a navigator/bombardier. Bombers flying
at 500 mph, it was felt, did not need defensive
gunners, only radar-controlled tail turrets.
North
American led the race with the medium-range
B-45, which was ordered into production
in January 1947. The bigger six-jet bombers
took longer. The AAF dealt a winning technological
hand to Boeing's designers, who were encouraged
to incorporate into their XB-47 the swept
wings and pod mountings found more successful
by German jet pioneers. Martin engineers
were told to stick with a "conventional
design" of straight wings and engines in
wing nacelles. Ken Ebel, by this time Martin's
Vice President in charge of engineering,
nevertheless tried several innovations in
the Martin XB-48. Its two huge nacelles,
each housing three jet engines, were themselves
designed as lifting bodies; internal air
ducts between the engines were supposed
to channel the airstream. The wings were
extremely thin for low drag at high speed.
This trick was accomplished by a "bicycle"
landing gear that folded into the fuselage
instead of the wing; it was tested in 1946
on the converted XB-26H Middle River Stump
Jumper.
In
order to speed the construction of the prototype,
Ebel and Tom Willey (now returned from Martin-Nebraska)
established a "company within a company,"
moving a picked engineering staff to the
B Building floor alongside the mockup, with
its own tool designers, machinists, bookkeepers,
and stores department. In the interests
of speed, needed parts would be made quickly
on the spot, without regard to specified
weights, materials, or detailed drawings.
Records were kept, however, so that they
could be properly replaced in the next prototype.
The
first XB-48 made its first flight on June
22, 1947, a 37-minute hop to Patuxent River
Naval Air Station, where the 11,000-foot
runway offered a larger margin for safety
than the 7,100-foot factory strip. Accustomed
as they were by this time to test flights,
the plant's neighbors were taken aback by
the smoky plumes of the six jet engines
and called police with reports of an airplane
on fire.
Tests
at Patuxent River were disappointing. The
XB-48's top speed was only 516 mph at 20,000
feet, 479 at the design altitude of 35,000.
Test pilot E.R. "Dutch" Gelvin reported
that the ducted nacelles, which had worked
well enough in the wind tunnel, dammed the
airflow at high speeds. The Boeing XB-47,
tested the following year in California,
was the clear winner. Its top speed at 15,000
feet was 580 mph, 545 at 35,000, and its
range was greater.
Boeing
received the first production order for
the B-47 in September 1948. In October the
second prototype Martin XB-48, its weight
duly brought down to specification first
flew. It was used to test equipment for
its successful competitor. Kept in repair
with parts taken from the first prototype,
it was equipped with high-altitude de-icing
blankets and other devices. When these tests
ended in mid 1951, the XB-48 was flown to
Aberdeen Proving Grounds and destroyed in
static structural tests.
In
1949, Glenn Martin invited Air Force officials
to redeem some of their $11.5 million investment
in the plane (and his company's sagging
fortunes) by ordering the Martin Model 247,
a turboprop-powered version of the XB-48
airframe. Unlike the B-47, this would have
true intercontinental range. The Air Force
saw its future in jets, however, and turned
the proposal down.
|